Time Magazine, 1941: Report on the Garand
We've all heard that the M1 Garand is the "greatest battle implement ever devised", and many folks speak of it as if the weapon never malfunctioned. It's pointed to as an example of how a semiautomatic rifle with a piston and an op-rod is immune to external influences such as mud or dirt.
Unfortunately, this article from 1941 tells us that that simply wasn't the case. One sentence accurately describes the testing: "Sum & substance of the findings was that the Garand was a fair-weather rifle."
Roy Dunlap's book Ordnance Went Up Front tells us:
"The M1's were going to ruin for lack of cleaning in the holes up front-the poor guys did not have anything to take care of them with, and often were not in a position to shoot them often enough to keep the barrels clear of corrosion (grass won't grow on a busy street-regardless of the corroding primer compound, if a .30-06 barrel gets a bullet through it every six or eight hours it will stay in pretty good shape). As a result of the fouling of gas cylinders and pistons, a large percentage of our semi-automatics were becoming singleshots."
The Garand was certainly an excellent rifle, but its legendary status in some circles proves to be a little too excessive.
Enjoy this article?
Vendors
- Best Survival Shop
- Deliberate Dynamics
- Elzetta
- LEO Armory
- Rainier Arms
- The Citizen's Armory
- Weapon Outfitters
Categories
Ads
Tags
Archives
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (20)
- December 2011 (24)
- November 2011 (12)
- October 2011 (14)
- September 2011 (21)
- August 2011 (9)
- July 2011 (14)
- June 2011 (11)
- May 2011 (21)
- April 2011 (14)
- March 2011 (10)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (27)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (19)
- October 2010 (20)
- September 2010 (23)
- August 2010 (24)
- July 2010 (13)
- June 2010 (19)
- May 2010 (9)
- April 2010 (13)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
- December 2009 (5)
- November 2009 (10)
- October 2009 (26)
October 25th, 2009 - 13:56
Many WWII and Korea vets I’ve spoken to, or opinions I’ve read, spoke to the fact that when they were not on the line, they cleaned their rifles. Also, when they were on the line, they tried to wipe the mud and dust off of the outside.
When this was done, very few vets had issues with the M-1, vis-a-vie reliability. Some did complain about the M-1′s size, weight, and recoil.
April 9th, 2010 - 06:36
The article was from March 1941….were these ‘gas-trap’ Garands in the test?