Comments on: Osprey Defense Scuba Test: Questionable Methods

By: Trey R

Trey R — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:46:29 +0000

This thing initially look intriguing but there are too many inconsistencies. The sand test, the scuba test… I have only seen a couple of those that impressed me, the 416 v/s the m4 and the acr tests.

By: Osprey Defense…A New Level of Something « Vuurwapen Blog

Osprey Defense…A New Level of Something « Vuurwapen Blog — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:34:08 +0000

[...] Errors, and Omissions 87gn 8:27 pm If you’ve read my Osprey Defense scuba “test” article, you probably picked up that I’m a little suspicious of the methods this company uses [...]

By: azoutdoorsman

azoutdoorsman — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:49:57 +0000

Duct tape huh? Sneaky bastards! I just thought that the silencer had blown a piece of baffle out or something.

By: Mike W

Mike W — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:41:35 +0000

Duh, I see you have a “Lies, Errors and Omissions” page. Nevermind.

By: Mike W

Mike W — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:32:02 +0000

I like the screen caps, good work and keep exposing the frauds. How about a BS or Scammers section to keep people from buying junk? you accept no advertising (currently anyway) so you are in no position to have to be PC about a product