Mike Pannone Tests the Bravo Company Upper Receiver Group
I know of no one who personally puts more rounds down the barrel of AR-15/M4 type weapons each year than Mike Pannone. I've had the honor of shooting with him several times, and came away from those brief sessions a better shooter. I greatly respect his opinion and experience on all things AR-15/M4.
He's recently completed an exhaustive test of a Bravo Company 14.5" M4 type upper receiver assembly. You can read the details here. In essence, he stripped away all lubrication, replaced critical items in the lower receiver, and proceeded to shoot 2400 rounds through the weapon with only magazine-related failures (he used USGI type mags to simulate as closely as possible the military M4).
POF R.D.I.K.
Inside POF-USA
Recently, I contacted Frank DeSomma of Patriot Ordnance Factory with a request for a T&E upper to be used for an upcoming SPR comparison.
Noting that I was in Arizona, Frank invited me to take a tour of POF's facility before I tested one of their uppers. It should go without saying that this was an offer I couldn't refuse.
Located in an industrial park devoid of any indication that a world class manufacturing facility lurks within, POF is composed of a machine shop - two machine shops, really - an assembly area, a shipping area, and a small front office. I was impressed when I saw that no employee seemed to be idle for more than a few moments during the entirety of my visit, which lasted nearly 3 hours. Everyone was doing something, and they all seemed to be doing that "something" in a very efficient manner.
Frank spent a good deal of time explaining the function of various components of the POF system. I'll cover those as best I can, but I may revise details over the next few days if I find that I misquoted him or made a technical error. I'll also probably expand on certain items in the next few days, but I have a lot of ground to cover here, so the initial post won't be as detailed as I'd prefer.
Frank came from the aerospace industry, and he had certain objectives when he set out to design his new system. His first objective was heat dissipation. To that end, every POF rifle and upper has a fluted barrel and an aluminum heat sink barrel nut - aluminum because it dissipates heat 5 times faster than steel. Even the shortest POF barrels are fluted, he said, because he doesn't believe in cutting corners.
Frank gave me a lot of impressive figures about heat dissipation after big round counts. I can't remember them exactly (I should have been writing this stuff down). He did tell me something very interesting that I can remember, though - although he uses standard bolts in his 5.56 firearms, he's never had a broken or cracked bolt come back for repair/replacement, nor has he had one break in his own testing.
I also was shown cutaways of upper receivers, both standard M4 and POF. I'm familiar with the phenomenon of receiver flex - when forces are exerted on a long handguard, especially with a vertical grip installed, the forward portion of the standard M4 receiver can deflect by a very small amount. This deflection, however, can cause premature wear and failure of bolts. To this end, companies such as Vltor have designed the MUR and VIS, LaRue Tactical has designed the Stealth as well as the OBR, and POF has designed its own upper receiver, seen below in cutout form next to a standard M4 receiver. Although they're facing away from one another, note how thin the top of the M4 receiver is compared to the POF upper.
After this "system overview", I was shown some new POF products - a 7.62x39 SBR was among them. Here, from the top, are 6.8, 7.62x51, and 7.62x39 POF SBRs.
More shots.
There were additional items discussed at that time, but I'll cut ahead to the manufacturing portion and cover those later.
Frank is very proud - as well he should be - that he manufactures most of the components for the P-415 and P-308 in house. We'll start with receivers.
Each P-308 lower receiver starts as a 7 pound "billet" of 7075-T6 aluminum. By the time the lower receiver is finished, 6 1/4 pounds have been whittled away. P-415 lower receivers start and end at a reduced percentages of those weights.
Magazine wells are wire EDM cut to precise tolerances - .0001 - that's one ten-thousandth of an inch.
Upper receivers come to life in two different buildings, but for the sake of organization, I'll describe it all at the same time.
5.56/6.8mm uppers start as 7075-T6 forgings. Note that multiple parts are being machined at one time - production was being maximized whenever possible.
Bravo Company MFG Mk12Mod0 Upper Receiver Group
What do you get when you order an upper receiver group from BCM?
You get a box...
Inside the box are a hat and a shirt (you may not get a shirt)...
There are also some stickers and a catalog...
A generous amount of bubble wrap is also included...
Inside the bubble wrap is some sort of long, cylindrical shaped object...
It's a faithful representation of the military Mk12 Mod0. For those of you not familiar with the Mk12 program, click here.
I'll be getting many more close up shots of the upper later today and will have a range report by the end of this weekend, although I will be breaking the upper in according to strict procedures, so there may not be an accuracy report just yet.
Smith Vortex vs. AAC Blackout
I'm not going to lie. Before I completed this test, I thought the AAC Blackout was all hype.
I thought AAC had engaged in shady marketing practices in order to show that their flash suppressor was superior to the competition, namely, the Smith Enterprises Vortex. I figured that I'd be spending $50 to pick up a Blackout and that I'd lose $10 reselling it after I did the comparison (maybe more than $10, if I said really bad things about it).
I was wrong.
Now, if you've seen my previous video comparing flash suppressors (or someone else's comparison of popular muzzle devices), you know that the Vortex was the most effective, eliminating nearly all visible flash. So it's not as if the Blackout could improve on the Vortex by a great amount - it's not as if the Blackout could create a black hole or anything. But what the Blackout could do - and, in my limited testing, did do - was eliminate what tiny bit of flash the Vortex couldn't.
Here's today's video. I start out with the A2 flash suppressor to establish a baseline for comparison. The weapon used is a Spike's Tactical M4 LE, a 16" barrel AR-15 with a carbine length gas system. The ammunition used is Federal XM193F, which is, I feel, a fairly common round.
I haven't sat down at the bench to determine if either device has an effect on accuracy, but if you're looking for a muzzle device that eliminates as much flash as possible, I recommend that you strongly consider the AAC Blackout.
Note - I apologize for the poor quality of the night vision video compared to the previous test. I think my video camera may have been damaged during a recent outing, and it's not taking video as clearly as it used to, especially in low light. My view through the PVS-14 was perfect, but the camera couldn't keep up.




















































